<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ENTERTAINMENT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.apache3.net/general/entertainment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.apache3.net/general/entertainment/</link>
	<description>I will help you earn lots of money and get the women of your dreams!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 09:35:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave_from_chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.apache3.net/general/entertainment/comment-page-1/#comment-1897</link>
		<dc:creator>dave_from_chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apache3.net/general/entertainment/#comment-1897</guid>
		<description>i downloaded the re-issue off of itunes because i read an article in our student newspaper (ya im in college) which claimed it fit the &quot;mold&quot; of the recent acts i&#039;d been listening to. Apparently Mclusky/Pixies/Bloc Party/Strokes/Jesus Lizard/whatever the kids call rock n roll these days ripped off this record... so i bought it because i&#039;m incredibly gullible and a wannabe critic and i wanted to fit in with the hip crowd at my school (i honestly cant say that with a straight face).
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;i was decently impressed. the lyrics are fun/introspective and have a strong political edge to them (i&#039;m told all punk must have some sort of political message... but as i said im an incredibly gullible sap just trying to fit into ashley simpson&#039;s world). the riffs are of mclusky-fare minus the intensity. some of the riffs are pretty fun. i grow tired of the album at the 8th song.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;i must admit damaged goods is downright brilliant. i hear a lot of the hives in this song. the first four, in fact, are downright awesome at times.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;maybe i&#039;m just showing my age but i&#039;m 21 and i felt more of a connection with mclusky and/or giddy motors and/or jesus lizard than gang of four... though i can definitely see the influence in these later act&#039;s music and for that i give them a reverent 4.5.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;this is a good album - dont get me wrong - but i just got tired of them after awhile. worth checking out though.
Rating: 4 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i downloaded the re-issue off of itunes because i read an article in our student newspaper (ya im in college) which claimed it fit the &#8220;mold&#8221; of the recent acts i&#8217;d been listening to. Apparently Mclusky/Pixies/Bloc Party/Strokes/Jesus Lizard/whatever the kids call rock n roll these days ripped off this record&#8230; so i bought it because i&#8217;m incredibly gullible and a wannabe critic and i wanted to fit in with the hip crowd at my school (i honestly cant say that with a straight face).</p>
<p>i was decently impressed. the lyrics are fun/introspective and have a strong political edge to them (i&#8217;m told all punk must have some sort of political message&#8230; but as i said im an incredibly gullible sap just trying to fit into ashley simpson&#8217;s world). the riffs are of mclusky-fare minus the intensity. some of the riffs are pretty fun. i grow tired of the album at the 8th song.</p>
<p>i must admit damaged goods is downright brilliant. i hear a lot of the hives in this song. the first four, in fact, are downright awesome at times.</p>
<p>maybe i&#8217;m just showing my age but i&#8217;m 21 and i felt more of a connection with mclusky and/or giddy motors and/or jesus lizard than gang of four&#8230; though i can definitely see the influence in these later act&#8217;s music and for that i give them a reverent 4.5.</p>
<p>this is a good album &#8211; dont get me wrong &#8211; but i just got tired of them after awhile. worth checking out though.<br />
Rating: 4 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Latta</title>
		<link>http://www.apache3.net/general/entertainment/comment-page-1/#comment-1896</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Latta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apache3.net/general/entertainment/#comment-1896</guid>
		<description>(Warning: this is an honest, objective review guaranteed to tee off die hard fans) 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;A word to young rockers who dig new bands like Franz Ferdinand (I&#039;ve only heard a few of that band&#039;s songs, truth be told) and want to check out Gang of Four because they&#039;ve heard about their influence: This stuff is really different. You may not like it. Personally, I like a lot of the bands Gang of Four influenced (from U2 to Rage Against the Machine, R.E.M. to the Chiles) much more than GoF itself. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;This album is pumped up, fairly rudementary, angular, punky, kinda funky, not extremely musical and often repetitive. The main drawback for me is Jon King&#039;s flat voice. It can get pretty tiresome. But this may not be a problem for you since there are plenty of not-so-great voices in rock (Bernard Sumner anyone?) that people don&#039;t seem to mind. Andy Gill&#039;s guitar is sharp, skratchy and cutting, but it sounds virtually the same throughout the whole album. And way too much has been made of the &quot;neo-psychedelia&quot; of the last track &quot;Anthrax.&quot; The &quot;psychedelia&quot; is mainly just a bunch of guitar feedback. Maybe it was a big deal to 15-yr-old punk clubbers in 1979 London who hadn&#039;t heard PIPER AT THE GATES OF DAWN. Oh, and the &quot;politics?&quot; They kick around a few interesting ideas about society, but in truth nothing too revelatory, politically speaking. Lyrics like &quot;guerilla war struggle is the new entertainment&quot; had more resonance in 1980; today, it&#039;s old news. Watching war on T.V. = guilty (or not guilty) pleasure for some is a common, much discussed topic, but it&#039;s still pretty cool they addressed issues like this. There is also some interesting commentary about interpersonal relationships. Note: they don&#039;t really have a problem with girls wearing bikinis as some people think while hearing &quot;I Found That Essence Rare.&quot; The reference pertains to &quot;BIKINI ISLAND&quot; where the U.S. tested nukes. No, it&#039;s not a particularly clever reference. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;For me, ENTERTAINMENT! is still a pretty cool little diversion once in a while. The Yellow EP is basically more of the same - overrated and not really that great compared to other music out there that is so much better. I can&#039;t comment on the other extra stuff that appears since I haven&#039;t heard it. I&#039;m sure I could have a blast at one of their shows - obviously a whole different monkey than hanging out and listening to the album. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Still, if you&#039;re looking for &quot;energy&quot; you could do a lot better. If you REALLY want to get blown away, go check out a Death album. That stuff will tear your head off and #&amp;@% down your neck. Looking for some good punk/post-punk/what-have-you from the same general time-frame? The Sex Pistols, The Clash and the early Talking Heads are much better musically (the new re-release of the live THE NAME OF THIS BAND IS TALKING HEADS with almost twice the original tracks is fantastic). Want funky rock? BLOOD SUGAR SEX MAGIC from the Red Hot Chili Peppers is pretty hard to beat. Actually you could probably beat it with some live James Brown circa &quot;Sex Machine.&quot; Or, if you can appreciate a totally wacked-out sense of humor, the ultimate funky rock has gotta be HIGHPERSPICE by the notorious Weapon of Choice. Party on! 
Rating: 3 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Warning: this is an honest, objective review guaranteed to tee off die hard fans) </p>
<p>A word to young rockers who dig new bands like Franz Ferdinand (I&#8217;ve only heard a few of that band&#8217;s songs, truth be told) and want to check out Gang of Four because they&#8217;ve heard about their influence: This stuff is really different. You may not like it. Personally, I like a lot of the bands Gang of Four influenced (from U2 to Rage Against the Machine, R.E.M. to the Chiles) much more than GoF itself. </p>
<p>This album is pumped up, fairly rudementary, angular, punky, kinda funky, not extremely musical and often repetitive. The main drawback for me is Jon King&#8217;s flat voice. It can get pretty tiresome. But this may not be a problem for you since there are plenty of not-so-great voices in rock (Bernard Sumner anyone?) that people don&#8217;t seem to mind. Andy Gill&#8217;s guitar is sharp, skratchy and cutting, but it sounds virtually the same throughout the whole album. And way too much has been made of the &#8220;neo-psychedelia&#8221; of the last track &#8220;Anthrax.&#8221; The &#8220;psychedelia&#8221; is mainly just a bunch of guitar feedback. Maybe it was a big deal to 15-yr-old punk clubbers in 1979 London who hadn&#8217;t heard PIPER AT THE GATES OF DAWN. Oh, and the &#8220;politics?&#8221; They kick around a few interesting ideas about society, but in truth nothing too revelatory, politically speaking. Lyrics like &#8220;guerilla war struggle is the new entertainment&#8221; had more resonance in 1980; today, it&#8217;s old news. Watching war on T.V. = guilty (or not guilty) pleasure for some is a common, much discussed topic, but it&#8217;s still pretty cool they addressed issues like this. There is also some interesting commentary about interpersonal relationships. Note: they don&#8217;t really have a problem with girls wearing bikinis as some people think while hearing &#8220;I Found That Essence Rare.&#8221; The reference pertains to &#8220;BIKINI ISLAND&#8221; where the U.S. tested nukes. No, it&#8217;s not a particularly clever reference. </p>
<p>For me, ENTERTAINMENT! is still a pretty cool little diversion once in a while. The Yellow EP is basically more of the same &#8211; overrated and not really that great compared to other music out there that is so much better. I can&#8217;t comment on the other extra stuff that appears since I haven&#8217;t heard it. I&#8217;m sure I could have a blast at one of their shows &#8211; obviously a whole different monkey than hanging out and listening to the album. </p>
<p>Still, if you&#8217;re looking for &#8220;energy&#8221; you could do a lot better. If you REALLY want to get blown away, go check out a Death album. That stuff will tear your head off and #&#038;@% down your neck. Looking for some good punk/post-punk/what-have-you from the same general time-frame? The Sex Pistols, The Clash and the early Talking Heads are much better musically (the new re-release of the live THE NAME OF THIS BAND IS TALKING HEADS with almost twice the original tracks is fantastic). Want funky rock? BLOOD SUGAR SEX MAGIC from the Red Hot Chili Peppers is pretty hard to beat. Actually you could probably beat it with some live James Brown circa &#8220;Sex Machine.&#8221; Or, if you can appreciate a totally wacked-out sense of humor, the ultimate funky rock has gotta be HIGHPERSPICE by the notorious Weapon of Choice. Party on!<br />
Rating: 3 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lovblad</title>
		<link>http://www.apache3.net/general/entertainment/comment-page-1/#comment-1895</link>
		<dc:creator>Lovblad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apache3.net/general/entertainment/#comment-1895</guid>
		<description>Even back when it came out I did not undesrtand the enthusiasm of the reviewers (5 stars in Rolling Stone). There is some interesting stuff and they play in an innovative way. For me it was allways soemwhat too stiff and I still do not like it that much...
Rating: 3 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even back when it came out I did not undesrtand the enthusiasm of the reviewers (5 stars in Rolling Stone). There is some interesting stuff and they play in an innovative way. For me it was allways soemwhat too stiff and I still do not like it that much&#8230;<br />
Rating: 3 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yanti Dowling</title>
		<link>http://www.apache3.net/general/entertainment/comment-page-1/#comment-1894</link>
		<dc:creator>Yanti Dowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 06:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apache3.net/general/entertainment/#comment-1894</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I really dissapointed because I never got my cd until today since I ordered the cd over a month ago. It supposed to be present for my husband in our anniversary but it turned out bad and made me felt bad. I ready got a charge in my credit card and paid for it but I never got it. I just wandering what happened with it. I ordered other 16 cds the same time with this cd too but I got them in mails without problem. Do I have to order it again and pay it?  
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I really dissapointed because I never got my cd until today since I ordered the cd over a month ago. It supposed to be present for my husband in our anniversary but it turned out bad and made me felt bad. I ready got a charge in my credit card and paid for it but I never got it. I just wandering what happened with it. I ordered other 16 cds the same time with this cd too but I got them in mails without problem. Do I have to order it again and pay it?<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Mcglothlin</title>
		<link>http://www.apache3.net/general/entertainment/comment-page-1/#comment-1893</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Mcglothlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 04:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apache3.net/general/entertainment/#comment-1893</guid>
		<description>This album is consistently ranked high by several critics and what not. So, I bought it recently expecting it to be some fantastic testament like Sgt. Pepper or some other ground breaking album. But, I just cannot seem to understand why Entertainment! is repeatedly ranked as a masterpiece. The music sounds sparse and empty. Actually, this album is just plain boring. I know I would have appreciated it more had I grown up with it, but it just seems not that great and certainly overrated. Perhaps this is why there are so many used copies available...
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;If you already are a Gang of Four fan, you will not be disappointed with this continuation of Rhino&#039;s fantastic attention to detail with this reissue. But, if you are just testing the waters for the first time, you may be disappointed.
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This album is consistently ranked high by several critics and what not. So, I bought it recently expecting it to be some fantastic testament like Sgt. Pepper or some other ground breaking album. But, I just cannot seem to understand why Entertainment! is repeatedly ranked as a masterpiece. The music sounds sparse and empty. Actually, this album is just plain boring. I know I would have appreciated it more had I grown up with it, but it just seems not that great and certainly overrated. Perhaps this is why there are so many used copies available&#8230;</p>
<p>If you already are a Gang of Four fan, you will not be disappointed with this continuation of Rhino&#8217;s fantastic attention to detail with this reissue. But, if you are just testing the waters for the first time, you may be disappointed.<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

